With a new football season comes some new questions, and
some old ones too. And a few which never go away.
Such is the lot of a Georgetown
fan, where promises are made but which stands the test of time, and not in a
good way. This is day 3,885 of the "will they or won't they" game
that is Cooper (nee Multi-Sport) Field, of which I've written as much as anyone, about the veritable lack of direction which has left this project as (save the
Boathouse), the longest running construction project at the Hilltop since the
Healy Building, which wasn't actually finished out for nearly two decades after
they started building it.
Since we last visited on the blog, there has been nothing to report
on the project, so much so that the
finished product ought to have a giant stone enscription across its facade: quod
sumus hoc eritis. Sadly, the lack of movement is endemic of a well-intentioned
program that can't seem to make any progress in the sport, much of that
self-inflicted.
Maybe I'm being a little jaded here. I'm one of these donors
who bought Bob Benson's sales pitch hook-line-and-sinker, sent the check and
waited for the goldmine to get going. And while the long-awaited Cooper gift
rallied the faithful, this too fell into the "need to know" approach
of donor relations, calling to mind the Lake Wobegon grocer who suggested "If you can't find it [here], you can probably get
along without it."
Amidst another off-season of vague discontent, a ray of hope
flickered across my Twitter feed last week:
Lots of attention on TAC & rightfully so! #TransformationalMoment. Haven't forgotten Cooper Field! #DoneInSpring18 pic.twitter.com/uss6C5ruS2— Lee Reed (@HoyasAD) August 4, 2016
Ok, one things jumps out there, and it's not those temporary
seats which stand as a sentinel to inertia: DoneInSpring18?
So while it's clear Lee Reed knows a lot I don't about this
project, there's a healthy bit of Missouri ("show me") in any claim
Georgetown makes about a facility. To wit:
Spring
18 is roughly 15 months away, yet there has been no design dislosed to the
public in over a decade. The Cooper gift is likely not to build a design
from the Bush administration.
The
last appearance by the University on this project in front of the DC
version of the Scylla and Charybdis (the Board of Zoning Adjustment and
the Old Georgetown Board) was, at least according to its records, 2007.
" No objection to revised concept design for Multi-sport facility at
the Georgetown
University with
stadium lights no taller than 80-ft high as shown in supplemental drawings
dated 21 September 2007," reads the minutes. "File new
submission of working drawings, including dimensions, details and material
samples, with permit application for review by the Commission when ready."
Well, even if they are ready, the BZA has already signed off, we think,
writing in 2012 that " The [John Thompson
Center ] was approved by the Commission in Z.C.
Order No. 07-23 under the 2000-2010 Georgetown University Campus Plan
along with the New Science Center and modifications to the
already-approved Multi-Sport Facility The approval for all three buildings
was extended by Z.C. Order No. 07-23A. Since that time, the University has
commenced construction of the New
Science Center
and the Commission’s orders of approval are now vested."
The next topic: how much is it? The public declaration of the
Cooper gift was certainly unclear about the share of the gift to fund the
field, and given estimates which variously ranged from $10 million to $45
million on the project, it's hard to guess how much of the gift will go to
the field and when. It would be foolish to assume that the $22 million in
pledges for MSF is still active or sitting in a bank account somewhere,
but at some point a price tag has to be determined to figure out what
it'll get. Will it be a Georgetownian version of Robins Stadium, whose $28
million commitment transformed the Richmond
campus? Or will it be more of a Tenney
Stadium , the single-sided redo of Marist's Leonidoff Field, with an
announced capacity of 5,000 but actual seating for less than 1,800?
But
what about the inevitable design changes? The latest campus plan doesn't provide many
clues.
One design in the plan envisions a three sided stadium:
But the plan endorses three buildings in close proximity to Cooper, any one of which could impact not only a timeline, but the use of the field itself. Writes the plan:
"A new building South of Regents Hall in the academic
core of campus, which would provide approximately 80,000 square feet of
academic space with ground floor student life functions supporting the Student
Life Corridor concept ;
▪ A new Harbin Tower on the existing Harbin Hall plaza,
which would provide approximately 67,000 square feet of academic and
administrative space along with double-level ground floor space dedicated to
student life functions supporting the Student Life Corridor concept;
▪ A component of the multi-use Reiss redevelopment option,
which would accommodate a full replacement of the existing facility’s 136,000
square feet of academic space"
Another design in the plan envisions a rather nondescript
one sided stadium:
And still another design (in the same document, no less) has
stands on the east side:
Maybe the Cooper gift isn't enough to build the 2007 design. Maybe it's not in the bank right now. Maybe it's as simple as they just don't know. But nothing says "cheap" in sports like a one-sided stadium. Remember that Latin phrase? "Such as we are, you will be."
So putting regulations, design and money for a moment, there
is one constant: time. To build a
facility by spring 2018, you have to basically close the field in 2017, yet
there is no chatter that Georgetown
is about to become a barnstorming team in 2017. A real facility is a 12-15
month effort with an aggressive calendar.
So which is it? I don't know, but I wish Georgetown knew. Maybe they do. Maybe, like a
lot of projects, it's on the University taxiway, waiting to be cleared for
departure.
It's been there way too long.